I talked to Matt Shearer, a reporter for WBZ Radio Boston this week for a story on how Northeastern Archives worked to put the Boston Phoenix free online this week. I missed listening to them live, but Matt sent me .mp3s. You can listen to them at the links below.
The first segment is on how people used to read the Phoenix while riding the T (Boston’s public transit system), and what it’s like for students to read the papers now:
*Shout out to 5 Malbert, the $303/month (which included toilet paper, but not utilities) 7 bedroom apartment I lived in for 4 years– It always had a band playing in the basement, someone sleeping on the couch, and a cockroach skeleton in the silverware drawer. Memories.
Northeastern University, my employer, recently reduced my sick time from 66 days per year to 12, effective January 1 2021. The messaging: “In setting the new parameters, HR found that, on average, employees take 5 sick days per year and that only 5% of employees use more than 9 days.”
I am one of the 5%–I’m a parent and someone who lives with chronic illnesses.
“Do you have a 7:30 AM or a 4:30 PM appointment available?” has been a mantra for all of my working life. Early on in my career, when I had limited sick time and positions that required my physical presence, I got used to holding each hour of sick time like a precious jewel. If I had a 7:30 AM appointment, I could usually make it in by 9:00, and if I had a 4:00 PM appointment and a flexible manager, I could come into work at 6:00 and not have to use (“waste” is actually the term I used, which in retrospect is problematic!) any of my time. I did this because inevitably, I had appointments that required sick time, either because I couldn’t see/walk/speak when they were over, or because they were with doctors with such tight schedules that they couldn’t accommodate my early/late needs.
The casual observer wouldn’t know that I had health challenges. I’m a valued leader both in my workplace and in my field. I always show up. But I have a minimum of 22 doctor appointments per year–47 when I was in regular therapy. I have two fairly healthy children, (4 additional doctor/dentist visits), a grand total of 51 doctor visits in any given year. To be clear, I hate the fact that medical care takes up such a large percentage of my life. But this is the one way I can continue to stay “well.”
And there are the things that just “happen.” Plantar fasciitis (2x/ diagnose 2x/week PT, 7:30 appointments x 6 weeks), broken bone (7 hours in the ER and 6x ortho +PT), kid had a non-serious health challenge (20x/year ped visits), and new school COVID restrictions require BOTH kids home if one has a sniffle (~6/year)–we used to keep them home only if they had a fever (~2-3/year).
When I started at Northeastern in 2014, I was amazed at the sick policy– employees received 22 days on day 1 with increases by longevity until 66. I thought that it was the sign of an organization that really cared for its more vulnerable employees. Even someone like me wouldn’t run out! I still asked for 7:30 and 4:40 appointments because I love my job and want to be as present as possible, but I allowed myself to take the occasional day off to stay home with a cold or a few hours to care for a sick kid before parking them in front of the computer with a bowl of cereal so that I could work. I felt safe because if one of my chronic illnesses required serious downtime or even more doctor appointments, I would have plenty available.
In one of the forums where folks were discussing this change, an astute observer noted, “This is a solution in need of a problem.” Was the problem the amount of sick time someone like me takes? HR hopes that its expanded leave policy (26 paid weeks for medical leave and 12 paid weeks to care for family after 7 days unpaid) will make up for such a drastic reduction in sick time. “Depending on your situation, there are pluses and minuses to this change in sick time policy.” For folks like me whose chronic illnesses require us to take regular sick time in order to keep ourselves and/or those in our care healthy and on track, this policy feels draconian, and I’m disappointed that HR enacted this blanket policy without finding out how it might affect the community’s most physically fragile.
Please note: this blog post, and this blog is mine and represents only my own, ideas, opinions as a human being and not as a representative of Unviersity in any way.
The Library (thanks, Kerri!) recently published a piece about the article I wrote for the Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies (currently in preprint) that problematizes for-profit companies selling digitized collections that originate from under-documented comminities, and our attempt to un-paywall the Gay Community News. I’ve pasted the text below, but the article can be read directly on the Library’s blog here.
TL;DR? The main message is to archivists and digital collection builders: You can un-paywall your collections legally, too!
When Jackson Davidow was looking for information on Boston’s gay community in the 1970s, he knew where to go.
“I’ve long been interested in the relationship between queer politics and queer art, particularly in Boston in the 1970s, a point at which the city was a crucial hub of gay discourse, activism, nightlife, and sex,” said Davidow, a postdoctoral fellow in the “Translating Race” Lab at the Center for the Humanities at Tufts University. Gay Community News “was grounded in the political, cultural, and social environments of Boston. For that reason, it is an invaluable resource for researchers who study gay and lesbian life and liberation in Boston and beyond.”
Gay Community News (GCN) was started in 1973 by eight Bostonians seeking to create a community voice for gays and lesbians in the Boston area. Originally published as a 2-page mimeographed sheet, the newspaper grew to have a national and international audience by the late 1970s and became one of the longest-running and most progressive national newspapers in the gay community. It was a natural place to start to gather the information Davidow needed. Issues of the GCN and records from its parent organization, the Bromfield Street Educational Foundation were subsequently donated to the Northeastern University Archives and Special Collections (NUASC).
While today’s researchers can contact many archives by email and receive scans of collections remotely, there was a time when physically visiting an Archives was only possible for those who lived in or could travel to the area. To provide more access to collections in the 1980s and 1990s, some Archives made arrangements to microfilm high use portions of their collections. In recent years those microfilms have been digitized and are offered via subscription to libraries — usually at a high cost — and then made available to the students and faculty affiliated with that university, a practice commonly described as “paywalling.”
Unfortunately, this means that the many of the volunteers who wrote and edited articles, turned the crank on the mimeograph machine, or paid to advertise a queer night at a local club no longer have access to the content they created. It’s a trend that Giordana Mecagni, Head of the NUASC, knows all too well. Troubled, she recently published “Tear Down This (Pay)wall!: Equality, Equity, and Liberation for Archivists” in the Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. The piece describes the negative effect paywalled archives have on institutions, archives, and researchers, and focuses on the GCN.
“Having the Gay Community News behind a paywall results in uneven access, where affiliates of universities can access the resource but members of marginalized groups within the queer community may not,” Mecagni wrote.
“Paywalls restrict who has access to archival materials. Many scholars are independent and unattached to academic institutions, or attached to academic institutions that do not have the money to subscribe to special historical resources,” Davidow added.
The NUASC recently completed an effort to made the Gay Community News freely available to anyone by re-scanning the GCN with help from the Boston Public Library’s “Library for the Commonwealth” program. This program provides free scanning services to Massachusetts libraries who have unique materials they want to share widely and freely. Now researchers, students, members of the LGBTQIA+ community, writers, and anyone else can browse through 26 years of the GCN to get a glimpse of the gay community in Boston and around the world.
Researchers like Davidow are thrilled.
“The digitization of GCN helps scholars and community members learn about and revisit these important histories,” he said. “During my research for my recent essay in The Baffler, ‘Against Our Vanishing,’ I talked with many people involved in GCN, and everyone was thrilled to learn that the full run is available online.”
Jackson Davidow was a 2020-2021 New England Regional Fellowship Consortium awardee, working in our University Archives and Special Collections and several other member archives He recently published an article in the Baffler that draws from his archival research on Gay art and politics in 1970s Boston including the newly publicly available Gay Community News. It is a wonderful read.
When I had been dancing for hours, hugging briefly one woman then another, jumping up and down, music blasting—Patti LaBelle, “Voulez-vous couchez avec moi / ce soir”—a moment would come when I would feel ecstatic with love for everyone, every single one of us, all of us lesbians together, even if I didn’t have anyone to go home with.
Here is a scratch pad of mapping, data, history projects related to Boston. I will continually update it as I come across additional projects
Tufts’ Boston Streets Project (2004) http://dca.lib.tufts.edu/features/bostonstreets/
Collection consists of 11 Boston City directories converted in to structured data, >3000 images from Bostonian Society photographic collections, and browse-able atlases from 1874, 1898, and 1928. “Orthographic images of modern day boston, and vector data from the boston redevelopment authority and MassGIS are used to ground the Boston in its modern context:”
Metro Boston DataCommon: An interactive data portal and mapping tool with information about the region’s people, neighborhoods, infrastructure, and environmental resources. http://metroboston.datacommon.org/