During the #d4d Design for Diversity Conference, Case study presenters talked about developing DH projects that are ethically embedded in the community. Wanting to learn a little more about the topic, I googled around and found guidelines for both “Community Engaged” and “Ethically Community Engaged” projects. Both had similar types of mild suggestions, such as ‘humility,’ ‘mitigating harm,’ ‘engaging across boundaries’ and ‘respecting self-determination.’ Obvious, right?
What was missing from the reports and guidelines I skimmed was any perspective from the impacted community ‘partner.’ Are they not asked for feedback?
The exception was in this “Characteristics of quality Community-Engaged Scholarship” from Pepperdine (this report is worth reading), but is just a citation.
It looks like this book “Service-Learning Through Community Engagement:What Community Partners and Members Gain, Lose, and Learn From Campus Collaborations”
by Lori Gardinier might shed some light on the community’s perspective, so I will put it on my list of books to read at some point.
#d4d case study presenters and conference attendees had some interesting ideas about forming an ethical community engagment certification (like LEED!) program. I have collated them and will post later.